[
:
اقه مندی ارکان ان المواتي
432
Matuller (13th. October, 1910). He sympathizes with the
Chinese complaint that "the British Government although
Cons 34pm 34462
they have promised their assistance, yet ask us to abstain
from exercising supervision and control" (6th. October,
1910), and although under instructions from Mr. Maxuller
he formally protested (25th. June, 1910) against the
regulations
(a). as imposing charges on Raw Opium in a
Treaty Port additional to those sanctioned by the Addition-
-al Article of the Chefoo Convention:
(b). as obliging purchasers to boil within 3 days:
(c). because the levy being in the hands of
Opium Merchants partakes of a Monopoly:
(d). because of the decennial arrangement with
India
I infer that he considers these grounds to be of doubtful
validity. He seems to me to fail to discriminate between
the perfect right, and indeed obligation, which China has
of increasing the price of Native Opium, and hampering its
sale and consumption in every way in her power,
equal obligation which lies upon her to observe the
Treaties regarding Foreign Opium the total extinction of
and the
which was as Sir John Jordan pointed out (enclosure 6 to
Sir
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.